スキップしてメイン コンテンツに移動

Let’s Think About Life with Dementia #4 Keep asking yourself, “What would I do?”―Learning Through the Case Method

 When discussing the life of a person with dementia, it is essential that we recognize a variety of people involved in the person’s daily living. In particular, community dementia support promotion members, who are assigned in each municipality as key actors in community building, play a crucial role.

 

Over the past few years, I have had opportunities to work with these promotion members in several municipalities, including training programs and lectures. As I listened to the members about the challenges facing them in the field, I have come to realize the enormity and difficulty of their role more than ever.

 

Actually, most of the promotion members have experience mainly in supporting individuals. But once they become promotion members, they are charged with the huge mission of community building. Many members feel lost about the change in their roles.

 

I have heard urgent cries for help as I listened to the members in the field, including:

“The role of promotion members is not fully understood in the workplace.”

“I can barely handle the tasks at hand, so I don’t have enough time or energy to pay attention to the community.”

“I don’t know how to communicate ideas and concepts to people in the community. I can’t find my own words.”

 

Also, uneasiness and stereotypes about dementia are surprisingly persistent in the community, with such comments as, “Everything is over once you have dementia” and “What can I do to prevent (avoid) it?” Although these people in the community have no ill intentions, their words and stares can sometimes become “invisible barriers” for people with dementia and their families.

 

Faced with these barriers, promotion members have been asking themselves, “What can I do?” and “How can we gradually change these stereotypes?” What is essential in addressing these questions, besides listening to the person’s voice and obtaining knowledge, should be creating opportunities to picture themselves in real-world situations and think about what to do in their own words. Based on this idea, my colleagues and I applied and received a research grant from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) (JSPS KAKENHI Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research, JP21K01985) to develop training materials using the case method.

 

The case method is a learning approach also used in business schools and other settings. Picturing themselves in a difficult situation, participants will think about what they would do and discuss the ideas with their peers. This method is designed to help participants deepen their way of thinking rather than learning the correct answer.

 

As I teach the case method in graduate school, I find an extremely good match between this method and welfare work, which often addresses questions without the right answers. In the project to develop teaching materials, we created stories (cases) based on concerns and confusion often facing promotion members in the field.

Let me share an example here.

 

[Case material] Is Everything over once you have dementia…?!

l   Case summary

Ms. Saito is a certified social worker at a community general support center. Recently appointed as a promotion member without enough briefing by the predecessor, she has been struggling with this new role. One day, Ms. Saito finds that Mrs. Akiyama, a long-time regular at the community salon, has been diagnosed with dementia and isolating herself at home since then. Her family also begins to worry that the only choice may be to send Mrs. Akiyama to a care facility. Ms. Saito has a bitter memory of being unable to respond to a comment by a salon participant: “Everything is over once you have dementia.” How can she face this persistent stereotype embedded in the community? How can she take a step as a promotion member? Together with Ms. Saito, let’s think about what you would do.

 

In this case study, we had a discussion based on the following two questions:

(1) What challenges is Ms. Saito facing?

(2) How will she move forward with the support (and why)?

 

For the first question (challenges), participants exchanged various opinions from multiple perspectives, including not only Mrs. Akiyama and her family but also local residents, professionals, and the organizational structure.

For the second question (approaches), a variety of ideas were shared including the following:

l   Listen attentively to Mrs. Akiyama’s life story and feelings, and find what she would like to focus on from now on.

l   Talk with Mrs. Akiyama’s family, suggesting that Mrs. Akiyama may be able to stay in the community with support from others, as well as informing them about the availability of places for family peer support.

l   Approach the staff members and director of the community general support center to help develop a system, ensuring that Ms. Saito does not need to handle everything by herself.

 

In the case method, participants deepen their discussion as they carefully examine each idea, including its reasons such as why this particular approach is necessary and what meaning it has. Through this process, they understand situations from multiple perspectives and share practical learning.

 

Although the case method is not suited for a large group, it allows participants to take time together to deeply consider and discuss the issue. In this process, the experience each participant brings serves as a valuable textbook. By broadening their perspectives by finding new ideas and ways of thinking, participants can gradually find the “next step” in the community. This type of learning may benefit not only professionals but every one of us as well.

         

Taeko Nakashima

Faculty of Health Management Department of Social Health and Business Management

Nihon Fukushi University

https://www.nfu.ne.jp/ (in Japanese)

 

コメント

このブログの人気の投稿

Cutting-edge Daily Life of Elderly #10 Joining Hands to Exchange Energy

We can now enjoy longevity as we live in the 100-year-life era. People first worked to extend the average life expectancy, and then aimed for longer healthy life expectancy. I would say Japan has now entered the era aiming for longer “engage life expectancy.” What is engage life expectancy? It is the period in which a person can contribute to society and others. Going beyond healthy life expectancy, it refers to how long we can be useful to society throughout our lives.   “We are offering free hand massages today. You’re welcome to try it.” A receptionist told me when I visited a car dealership the other day. Lucky me! I instantly replied, “Yes, please!”   The massage space was set up in a corner of the showroom, with two massage therapists waiting for guests. The one on the right was a young, innocent-looking woman, carefully checking the cosmetic items she’d use for massaging. The one on the left was an older women, looking fully ready to serve and smiling at m...

< Series: What is “normal” in Japan, what is “normal” in other countries #1> Where do people want to spend their final days? Where do they actually spend their final days?

 From 2010 to 2011, the International Longevity Center Japan carried out an international comparative research project on end-of-life care. As part of this project, we conducted the International Comparative Study on Ideal Terminal Care and Death. In this study, we asked medical doctors, nurses, direct care workers, and social workers about what they thought was ideal terminal care and what would actually happen.   The International Comparative Study on Ideal Terminal Care and Death : English summary. https://www.ilcjapan.org/studyE/doc/End-of-life_Care.pdf List of research activities since 2010 (in English) https://www.ilcjapan.org/studyE/index.html   In this study, we presented these professionals in different countries with hypothetical cases, including Mrs. A with terminal cancer as shown below. We asked them where they thought would be the best place for Mrs. A to spend her final days. Additionally, we asked them where they thought she would actually ...

推し活とプロダクティブ#15 社会的処方とプロダクティブ

夏休み、いつもより 80 代の両親と過ごす時間の長い毎日。 慌ただしすぎて気づかなかったこと、一部分しか知らずに深刻さを理解していなかったことを突きつけられる毎日。   ため息ばかりではあるけれど、研究者としては、毎日を追いかけることで新たな発見もあったりする。 その一つが、母が不安定になるとはじまる二つの行動の実態が見えたこと。   母の不安や焦りのサインとも言えるのだけれど、一つ目の行動が、同じ家にいる夫に、ひどい日は 100 回以上も電話をかけ続けること。 留守電にしてる父のスマホには、実家や昔の住まいに「迎えに来てください」のメッセージがたくさん。   これが増えるときに連動しているのが、認知症外来への通院日と一番身近な家族である夫が外出したり zoom などで自分の知らない世界と楽しそうに話した後。 不安だよね … 、漠然とした事実を突きつけられるって、支えだと思っていた人が知らない世界にいるって … 。   もう一つの行動が、何時間も何回も、食器棚や冷蔵庫の整理をすること。 お皿の位置がしょっちゅう変わり、買ったばかりの新玉ねぎが丸ごと冷凍庫に入っていたり、ワタシもイライラしてしまうことも多々だったのだけれど … 。   夏休み、チラチラ観察をした結果、わかったのが、この引き金となるトリガーがあること。 それは、忘れちゃう、無くしちゃう、作りすぎちゃう母に先回りして家族が役割を奪ってしまうこと。   できないでしょ、座っててと部屋の片隅に押しやるのは一番やっちゃいけないこと。 わかってはいるけれど、やっぱり一緒にいる時間が多いほどに難しい … 。   そんな日常で驚くのは、冬の個展に向けて作品の準備をしたり、認知症になったご近所さんを心配をしている時はかっての母に戻ること。 発注済みの額縁屋さんに何度も電話したり、ご近所さんが既に亡くなっていることを忘れていたりというオチはあるのだけれど … 。   元気な時よりも、弱ってきた時ほどに、役割を持っていると感じられることって大事。 それを家族だってわかっちゃいるけれど、余裕もないし、ストレスで自分が助けてもらいたい位の状況だったりも...